|
PAINTING THE MULTIPLICITY OF THE WORLD.
By Tom Jorgensen, reviewer at the “Ekstra
Bladet”, a Danish popular daily and editor of the “Kunstavisen”, a
monthly national magazine about topical art. |
|
1 |
|
Jackpot! This is the name of Tom Kroejers
latest series of paintings, created in the porter’s lodge at
Glorup Manor in Funen where the ever travelling Tom Kroejer is
domiciled at present. If one believes in fate, there must be a
deeper sense in the fact that the 59-year-old artist has settled
precisely here, because it was at the very same Glorup Manor that
another globe-trotter, H. C. Andersen, often came to stay.
Kroejer has never made a secret of his
admiration for old H. C., his imagination, his creative powers and
his incomparable capability to express a diversity of nuances in
the language. |
|
1 |
|
1111
1111Jackpot
I |
11 |
1111
Jackpot II1111
|
| 1 |
|
Jackpot! The entire series of brilliantly
coloured paintings has the same subtle combination of insight,
sensuality and refined sense of humour which H. C. too possessed;
that is, when he was not complaining about his eternal troubles
with his belly, money or love affairs.
Because Jackpot is precisely what cannot be the
result of Kroejers paintings. Even though the colourful shapes are
similar to each other, there are not two that are identical in the
entire series, but 212 different. A gambler’s nightmare!
Kroejer is out for nothing less than an
artistic rehashing of the entire modern nuclear physics and
thermodynamics. When he names each individual painting
“Undividable Paintings” he is referring to the quest for the
smallest particles in the universe that has engaged the attention
of the Western World since classical Antiquity; a quest which has
only led to ever smaller particles, molecules, atoms, electrons,
ions, etc., etc., apparently indefinitely. As if nature mocks at
our scientific attempt to grasp cosmos with a pair of scales and a
measuring tape. |
|
1 |
|
1111
1111Jackpot
III |
11 |
1111
Jackpot IV1111
|
| 1 |
|
I think that the first person to realise this
fact, was our own Niels Bohr, who started to sense that the whole
cosmos, micro or macro, is a paradoxical and capricious one, where
every scientific experiment is affected by the person carrying out
the experiment. So logic is out the window when it is no longer 1,
2, 3, 4, 5 but 1, blue, circus, giggle, Q. No wonder that Einstein
exclaimed indignantly that surely God does not play dice with the
universe.
For Kroejer, however, the dice image is quite
adequate, for what is lost in terms of logic and clarity is gained
in terms of imagination and diversity. Bohr’s universe is a universe
in which any kind of fundamentalism, religious or artistic, is
absurd and self-contradictory, and if there is anything that Kroejer
does not like, it is fundamentalism.
|
|
1 |
|
1111
1111Jackpot
V |
|
1111
Jackpot VI1111
|
|
1 |
|
Right from his outset in the Eks-school, where
he mixed with such celebrity artists as Kirkeby, Gernes and
Noergaard he detested dogmas, which resulted in his exclusion by
the very left wing-like Kirkeby from the school, a fate shared by
many others. For Kroejer the school was not a holy calling, but a
practical opportunity to gain access to the expensive printing
machines.
And he also had another characteristic that fit
poorly into the rather self-important image of the Eks-school: an
anarchistic and humorous view of life as well as of art. |
|
|
1111
1111Jackpot
VII |
|
1111
Jackpot VIII1111
|
|
|
1111 |
|
|
During the politically correct ‘70s, where
Kroejer participated in a large number of collective happenings,
for instance under the auspices of the Drakabygget, his heartfelt
engagement in society was almost always coloured by a Monty
Python-like humour that separated him from the all too
sanctimonious artists.
Furthermore, an interest in Andy Warhol that in
time would make old brothers-in-arms declare Kroejer a commercial
and gallery-like artist, is also a part of the picture. |
| 1 |
|
1111
1111Jackpot
IX |
11 |
1111
Jackpot X1111
|
| 1 |
|
Kroejer admires Andy because this peroxided
eccentric revolutionised the entire notion of the role of art.
Firstly of all, Warhol chose subjects which
until then had been generally disliked by the highbrow
establishment: the movie and pop stars, the headlines and the
commercial world of advertising, in short, the heretic symbols of
mass culture and consumerism. In his art, Warhol cheers everything
that the consumer of the new era utilised in everyday life and
turns the concepts of highbrow and lowbrow culture up-side-down.
Second of all, by his serigraphy he shows how
to mass produce art, so that it becomes something everybody can
afford. With his impartial and distanced view of things he
registered everything from Elvis, Coke bottles, Jackie Kennedy and
flowers to car accidents and electrical chairs. The art had come
down to earth, it had become democratic and if Warhol had by that
reduced the artist to a mere producer of goods, it was something
we could live with, for what could be more popular than doing
something that ordinary people were fond of and could afford? |
| 1 |
|
1111
1111Jackpot
XI |
|
1111
Jackpot XII1111
|
| 1 |
|
All this was to Tom Kroejer’s liking.
As the ‘70s wore on, he got ever more fed up by
being lead by the nose by art dealers who might just as well be
selling chocolate or garden gnomes and he decided that the best
thing to do was to meet the consumer society on its terms and
become an art producer or a free merchant as he terms it himself.
Thanks to his deep resentment against becoming yet another artist
funded by the government and thereby incapacitated, he had
excluded himself from the self-important brotherhood of the
Parnassus anyway. |
| 1 |
|
1111
1111Jackpot
XIII |
|
1111
Jackpot XIV1111
|
| 1 |
|
Inspired by Andy and pop art, Kroejer now begins painting the entire
multiplicity of this wonderful world. The pulsating beat of Manhattan, the
lavender scented landscapes of Provence, the lush gardens of Japan, the
bays of Ireland, laden with rain, and the sleepy small towns of Denmark.
Kroejer
selects a subject that is already beautiful, a landscape, some fruits, a
market place, an advertisement display pillar, in short, anything, makes a
sketch on which the colour scheme is noted and then paints the final
painting with all the skill that lifelong grind has taught him. In time
Kroejer has achieved an arabesque-like beauty and simplicity in his
pictures which remind us of partly Matisse, partly Hockney and the
American pop artists, a space accentuated, colourful and pleasurable type
of painting. |
| 1 |
|
1111
1111Jackpot XV |
|
1111
Jackpot XV1111
|
| 1 |
|
With
his independence, his curiosity and sense of humour, Tom Kroejer is closer
to the visions of the ‘60s of a democratic popular art than all the
bilious avant-gardiste artists, who take pride in being as immaterial and
stowed-away-in-ivory-towers as possible. It strikes me as odd that an
ability to do well without public funding should be a sign of artistic
decay, but then again, there are so many things that are odd in the odd
world of art.
Finally, let me quote a few word by Matisse which fits well into the
artistic universe of Tom Kroejer:
“I
dream about art in balance, pure and serious art, devoid of disturbing and
depressing subjects, art which is potentially reassuring, something
mentally consoling like a good armchair in which to rest from physical
fatigue to every intellectual worker, business man or author”. |
| 1 |
|
1111
1111Jackpot
XVII |
|
1111
Jackpot XVIII1111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|